“ChatGPT’s Fresh Feature ‘Browsing with Bing’: The Unusual Aspect of AI Observation”
Browse with Bing is ChatGPT’s answer to Google Bard
When comparing ChatGPT and Google Bard, one notable advantage Google Bard had was its ability to provide answers using the latest search data, unlike ChatGPT, which relied on training data from 2021. This limitation meant that ChatGPT lacked information about events and developments beyond that timeframe.This constraint was significant, as ChatGPT remained fixed in time, unaware of post-2021 occurrences. While Google Bard could offer detailed answers confidently, ChatGPT had to be more reserved. The fear of providing outdated information, especially regarding the current owner of Twitter, added an extra layer of caution.However, this distinguishing factor has now been eliminated. OpenAI has announced the adoption of Bing as the default search experience for ChatGPT, making it available to both ChatGPT Plus users initially and soon to free users. This move levels the playing field, removing the feature advantage that Bard previously enjoyed. Additionally, since Bard lacks the Plugins feature, it places Google at a disadvantage.Enhanced Search Capabilities: ChatGPT with Bing Conducts Multiple Searches per Query
Upon activating this feature, it becomes evident that ChatGPT engages in multiple searches rather than just one to obtain the desired answer. To understand its reasoning process, you can explore its train of thought by selecting the small button above the provided answer. Witnessing the steps it takes to reach the final result is truly intriguing.In the previously mentioned case, it was noteworthy that ChatGPT primarily defaulted to two US-based news outlets and US-centric headlines, with inclusion of BBC and Aljazeera but omitting sources like the Times of India or Deutsche Welle. For an Australian user, outlets such as ABC, the Sydney Morning Herald, or the Herald Sun might have been more relevant in a typical Bing or Google search. The NYT being paywalled adds an additional layer of complexity to the search.Despite this, ChatGPT doesn’t consistently exhibit what could be termed as “expert-level Google-fu” or “Bing-fu” in seeking results. For example, it might explore Twitter for an answer but overlook other potential research avenues, leading to inaccuracies that a more thorough approach could have resolved.This issue could potentially be addressed through more targeted prompt engineering or sequential queries. It seems likely that the limitation on tokens per query is intentional; an exhaustive search could potentially deplete the available tokens for responding to the user.However, for relatively straightforward queries where multiple searches aren’t necessary, ChatGPT can provide relevant information.
In the previously mentioned case, it was noteworthy that ChatGPT primarily defaulted to two US-based news outlets and US-centric headlines, with inclusion of BBC and Aljazeera but omitting sources like the Times of India or Deutsche Welle. For an Australian user, outlets such as ABC, the Sydney Morning Herald, or the Herald Sun might have been more relevant in a typical Bing or Google search. The NYT being paywalled adds an additional layer of complexity to the search.Despite this, ChatGPT doesn’t consistently exhibit what could be termed as “expert-level Google-fu” or “Bing-fu” in seeking results. For example, it might explore Twitter for an answer but overlook other potential research avenues, leading to inaccuracies that a more thorough approach could have resolved.This issue could potentially be addressed through more targeted prompt engineering or sequential queries. It seems likely that the limitation on tokens per query is intentional; an exhaustive search could potentially deplete the available tokens for responding to the user.However, for relatively straightforward queries where multiple searches aren’t necessary, ChatGPT can provide relevant information.In the previously mentioned case, it was noteworthy that ChatGPT primarily defaulted to two US-based news outlets and US-centric headlines, with inclusion of BBC and Aljazeera but omitting sources like the Times of India or Deutsche Welle. For an Australian user, outlets such as ABC, the Sydney Morning Herald, or the Herald Sun might have been more relevant in a typical Bing or Google search. The NYT being paywalled adds an additional layer of complexity to the search.Despite this, ChatGPT doesn’t consistently exhibit what could be termed as “expert-level Google-fu” or “Bing-fu” in seeking results. For example, it might explore Twitter for an answer but overlook other potential research avenues, leading to inaccuracies that a more thorough approach could have resolved.This issue could potentially be addressed through more targeted prompt engineering or sequential queries. It seems likely that the limitation on tokens per query is intentional; an exhaustive search could potentially deplete the available tokens for responding to the user.However, for relatively straightforward queries where multiple searches aren’t necessary, ChatGPT can provide relevant information.
ChatGPT Prioritizes Providing Credible References
In the past, ChatGPT would provide answers without disclosing its sources, occasionally inventing nonexistent books and papers. However, a notable shift occurred when using ChatGPT, where the chatbot became focused on cross-referencing. Statements now included small hyperlink numbers indicating the source domain of the information.Even more noteworthy was the chatbot’s willingness to apologize if it couldn’t cross-reference something. In such cases, it shared the source it had used and assured its credibility.How to use ChatGPT’s Latest Browse with Bing Functionality
Select your profile name located in the bottom-right corner (next to the …).Access the Settings option.Navigate to Beta features.Toggle the field next to “Browse with Bing.”Initiate a new chat.Click on GPT-4 at the top-center of the screen.Choose Browse with Bing [Beta].You’re all set. Pose a query and give it a try!
We deliver services and solutions by applying our Digital, Data, Technology and Cyber capabilities.
Categories
- Application
- Capabilities
- Cloud
- Credentials
- Cyber
- Data
- Delivery
- Design
- Development
- Digital
- Live (Operations)
- Services
- Solutions
- Strategy